Evaluation of Limited Sampling Methods for Oral Busulfan Pharmacokinetic Monitoring in Adult Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Monitoring busulfan area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) to establish the dose regimen for stem cell transplantation desirable to achieve efficacy while avoiding toxicity. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare AUCs calculated by 18 limited sampling methods (LSMs) from 2 to 5 samples to reference AUCs determined from 10 samples in a retrospective study of 103 adult patients receiving oral busulfan. LSMs using 2 or 3 samples were ineffective. METHODS: Four LSMs using 4 or 5 blood samples that accurately characterized busulfan AUC were identified. The best 2 methods were obtained with sampling at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours and after 1, 1.5, 2, 4, and 6 hours postdose. For these LSMs, the incidence of 20% difference between AUCs from LSMs and reference AUCs was less than 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Effective and safe determination of AUC for oral busulfan can be made with strategies using only 4 or 5 concentration timepoints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".