<sup>31</sup>P NMR Studies Demonstrating the Assembly of <i>catena</i>-Phosphorus Frameworks from Chlorophosphinochlorophosphonium Cations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New examples of chlorophosphinochlorophosphonium (4) and chlorophosphinodichlorophosphonium (5) cations have been prepared and spectroscopically characterized. These bifunctional phosphinophosphonium cations offer a new approach to the development of phosphinophosphonium frameworks using reductive coupling reactions and have been exploited as synthons to assemble larger catena-phosphorus cations. The reactions of 4 and 5 with stibine reducing agents have been studied using (31)P NMR spectroscopy and have been shown to produce a variety of new and known frameworks in a facile manner, depending on the reducing agent selection and the stoichiometry of the reaction. New derivatives of frameworks containing three, four, and five phosphorus atoms have been identified by (31)P NMR spectroscopy. Crystals of the [GaCl(4)](-) salt of the five-membered dication 11((i)Pr) have been isolated from the reaction of [4((i)Pr)][GaCl(4)] with SbBu(3), and the solid state structural features and solution state dynamics are comprehensively described in the context of (31)P{(1)H} NMR spectroscopic observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".