MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328878247 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.150998

Myeloid-related Protein 8/14 Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Marker of Disease Activity and Response to Methotrexate

2016· article· en· W2328878247 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pradeepta Sekhar Patro, Ankita Singh, Ramnath Misra, Amita Aggarwal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisMethotrexateInterquartile rangeInternal medicineRheumatismGastroenterologyRheumatologyC-reactive proteinArthritisInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Myeloid-related proteins (MRP) 8/14 belong to a family of calcium-binding proteins produced by myeloid cells. Baseline serum levels of MRP8/14 have been shown to predict response to biologicals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line therapy in RA, we studied whether MRP8/14 levels can predict response to MTX. METHODS: Patients with active RA disease who were naive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were enrolled. All patients were treated with MTX only, to a maximum of 25 mg/week or the maximal tolerated dose. At 4 months, the European League Against Rheumatism response was assessed. All patients who needed rescue therapy after 2 months or who did not respond at 4 months were classified as nonresponders. RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled, of whom 3 discontinued MTX within 4-6 weeks, so 87 patients were analyzed [74 women, median (interquartile range; IQR) for the Disease Activity Score at 28 joints (DAS28) was 4.43 (4.1-5.1)]. The median (IQR) serum MRP8/14 level at baseline was 19.95 µg/ml (11.49-39.06). The serum MRP8/14 had good correlation with DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP; r = 0.35, p = 0.001). The MRP8/14 levels fell significantly after 4 months of treatment (10.28 µg/ml, 5.95-16.05, p < 0.001). Among 87 patients, 69 were responders. The median (IQR) baseline level of MRP8/14 was higher among responders compared with nonresponders: 23.99 µg/ml (15.39-42.75) versus 9.58 µg/ml (6.11-24.93, p = 0.00250). The levels declined in the responders, from 23.99 µg/ml (15.39-42.75) to 10.41 µg/ml (5.83-15.61, p < 0.001), but not in the nonresponders, from 9.58 µg/ml (6.11-24.93) to 9.19 µg/ml (7.74-21.96, p = 0.687). Receiver-operation characteristic analysis showed that MRP8/14 was a better predictor of response than CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, especially with early disease onset (< 1-yr duration). CONCLUSION: MRP8/14 is a good marker of disease activity in RA, and higher levels predict response to MTX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207