Absolute Quantification of Peptides by Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography–Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Absolute quantitation of peptides/proteins in dilute calibration solutions used in various diagnostic settings is a major challenge. Here we report the absolute quantitation of peptides by non-species-specific isotope dilution liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ID LC-ICPMS) based on stoichiometric Eu tagging. The method was validated by species-specific isotope dilution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis of constituent amino acids of the target peptide. Quantitative labeling of bradykinin peptide was accomplished with a commercially available 2',2″-(10-(2-((2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl)oxy)-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl) triacetic acid (DOTA-NHS-ester) and subsequently tagged with Eu. A (151)Eu-enriched spike was used for the non-species-specific ID LC-ICPMS determination of bradykinin. The non-species-specific ID LC-ICPMS method was cross-validated by a species-specific ID GC/MS approach, which is based on the determination of phenylalanine in bradykinin to derive the concentration of the peptide in the sample. The hydrolysis of the peptide into amino acids was achieved by microwave digestion with 4 M methanesulfonic acid, and derivatization of phenylalanine with methyl chloroformate (MCF) was performed prior to its detection by GC/MS based on a (13)C-enriched phenylalanine spike. The accuracy of the method was confirmed at various concentration levels with a typical precision of better than 5% relative standard deviation (RSD) at 20 pmol for non-species-specific ID LC-ICPMS and 500 pmol for species-specific ID GC/MS. A detection limit (3 SD) of 7.2 fmol estimated for ID LC-ICPMS with a 10 μL injection volume from three procedure blanks was obtained for bradykinin, confirming the suitability of the method for the direct determination of peptides at trace levels. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed method is the first ICPMS peptide quantification strategy which employs an independent validation strategy using species-specific ID GC/MS for amino acid quantitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".