Prospective Application of A3B3C62 Type Semiconductors for Developing Nano-size Electronic Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we present the most recent results of our studies on TlInTe2 and TlInSe2 crystals (continuing our earlier studies on TaGaTe2), and analyze the nano-size application perspectives of A 3 B 3 C 6 2 semiconductors. It has been shown that A 3 B 3 C 6 2 semiconductors are prospective materials for developing the nano-size devices such as varistors, solid electrolytic accumulators and supercapacitors. The analysis is based on our experimental studies, which include the temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity, THz spectra, and permittivity. It has been shown that the electrical conductivity parameters of A 3 B 3 C 6 2 type semiconductors can be affected by -irradiation, and the effect depends on the dose of irradiation. The possibility of restructuring of electrical conductivity mechanism in these semiconductors makes them attractive for designing new nano-size electronic devices with controlled parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".