Bibliographic record
Abstract
Correspondence: Dr Patrick McGrath, Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Dalhousie University; IWK Health Centre and Capital District Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia. 5850 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3K 6R8. Telephone 902-470-6511, fax 902-470-6767, e-mail patrick.mcgrath@iwk.nshealth.ca The challenges of complex and recurrent pain in children and youth are beginning to yield to systematic investigation. The current issue of Pain Research and Management contains a special series on pediatric pain based on keynote addresses presented by world-renowned clinicians and scientists at the International Forum on Pediatric Pain held at White Point Beach, Nova Scotia, in October 2011. The articles reflect the increasing sophistication of research and practice in the area and the application of rigorous science in the service of more effective pain control. Goldschneider (pages 386-390) summarizes the knowledge regarding complex regional pain in children and youth, and integrates what is known from adult and pediatric studies to arrive at a new perspective on this debilitating disorder. Stinson et al (pages 391-396) review pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, including the novel use of Internet interventions. Asmundson et al (pages 397-405) develop and apply a pediatric version of the very productive fear-avoidance model of pain. This extension of the model opens up new ways of approaching treatment. Logan et al (pages 407411) focus on the context of chronic pain and elucidate the implications of an ecological perspective for understanding the development of chronic pain and broad strategies for intervention. Finally, Levy and van Tilburg (pages 413-417) review the history and new developments in chronic recurrent abdominal pain. In the next decade, a more theoretically sophisticated understanding of chronic and recurrent pediatric pain will emerge. Models that integrate biological, psychological and social aspects will be used in multicentre studies of typical patients, with longer follow-up. These articles provide the basis for major advances in this important field. editorial
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.034 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".