MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329048195 · doi:10.4172/2324-8785.1000256

Rhinosporidiosis: A Case Report of 2 Cases from Gujarat

2015· article· en· W2329048195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kuldip G Khandla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Otology & Rhinology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicInfectious Diseases and Mycology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhinosporidiosisMedicineNoseEpiglottisSurgeryBiopsyLesionFulgurationLarynxDermatologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rhinosporidiosis is a chronic granulomatous disease caused by Rhinosporidium seeberi and it affects both man and animals. It mainly affects nose and nasopharynx. Other sites that can be involved are conjunctiva, Urethra, palate, tongue, epiglottis, larynx, trachea, bronchi, skin, vulva and vagina. Most of the cases are found in India, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan. Some other cases also have been reported from Africa, South America, Europe, North America and Canada. In India, disease is common in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Chhattisgardh, Puducherry, Andhra Pradesh. It is uncommon in Gujarat. Case presentation: Two cases from village area of Gujarat presented to our institute in 2010 and 2015. Both were male between 15-20 years. Presenting complaint was nasal blockage in both and on examination polypoidal, erythematous mass was present in nasal cavity which bleed on touch. Biopsy from the lesion confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion: Though it is uncommon, Rhinosporidiosis should be kept in mind while treating any nasal mass. Biopsy should be taken whenever diagnosis is doubted. Surgical excision of mass lesion with bipolar electrocoagulation is treatment of choice. Recurrence is less common if complete removal is done. Role of medical therapy is doubtful and it was not given in these 2 cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Otology & RhinologySame topicInfectious Diseases and MycologyFrench-language works237,207