Subtalar Joint Axis in Patients With Symptomatic Peritalar Subluxation Compared to Normal Controls
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The etiology of peritalar subluxation (PTS) is poorly understood and likely mutifactorial. An anatomic predisposition for posterolateral subluxation of the hindfoot has not been previously described or investigated. The aim of the current study was to describe the morphology of the subtalar joint axis (STJA) in patients with symptomatic PTS compared to normal controls. METHODS: We identified patients with symptomatic PTS who had undergone operative correction from hospital records. The angle of the axis of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint was made on simulated weight-bearing CT (SWBCT) scans. A control group of patients who had no foot deformity on standing films was used for comparison. The STJA was defined as the angle between the superior talar dome and the posterior facet of the talus on coronal CT scan. The mean, maximum, and minimum STJAs were calculated for each cut from anterior to posterior across the posterior facet. The trend in progression across the posterior facet was also examined. RESULTS: After exclusions, 22 feet in 20 patients were included in the study group and compared to 20 control subjects. It was seen that patients with PTS had an increased valgus orientation of the subtalar joint. In patients with PTS the STJA began in valgus and progressed to even greater valgus from anterior to posterior across the posterior facet. The STJA in control subjects was seen instead to begin in slight varus and transition to valgus at the junction of the anterior and middle third and then increase in valgus as the joint progressed posteriorly. CONCLUSIONS: The valgus orientation of the coronal plane of the subtalar joint may represent an anatomic contribution to the etiology of PTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it