MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329182481 · doi:10.1021/jp5075779

Highly Oxidized Graphene Anchored Ni(OH)<sub>2</sub> Nanoflakes as Pseudocapacitor Materials for Ultrahigh Loading Electrode with High Areal Specific Capacitance

2014· article· en· W2329182481 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yongfu Tang, Yanyan Liu, Wanchun Guo, Teng Chen, Hongchao Wang, Shengxue Yu, Faming Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsPseudocapacitorX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCapacitanceMaterials scienceGrapheneOxideConductivityElectrodeMicrostructureChemical engineeringSupercapacitorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyComposite materialMetallurgyChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contact between Ni(OH) 2 and graphene oxide (GO) determines the specific capacitance, high-rate performance, and stability of Ni(OH) 2 -GO composites when they were used as capacitive materials with high/ultrahigh material loading. To improve this contact, the exfoliated GO from Hummers’ method is oxidized twice for anchoring Ni(OH) 2 nanoflakes. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results reveal that the further oxidation process increases the carbonyl (C–O) groups and oxygen content on the GO surface. The Ni(OH) 2 -GO composites were obtained through a simple hydrothermal process. Morphology and microstructure characterizations indicate that the further oxidation of GO improves the affinity of Ni(OH) 2 and GO via the increased surface groups on the GO. Due to the high conductivity and suitable structure, the Ni(OH) 2 anchored on the treated GO (Ni(OH) 2 /TGO) exhibits good capacitive performance and high areal specific capacitance. The Ni(OH) 2 /TGO exhibits high specific capacitance of 1236.4 F g –1 at 1.0 mV s –1 and 1374.8 F g –1 at 0.1 A g –1, respectively, which is higher than that of Ni(OH) 2 on the untreated GO. The capacitance retention of Ni(OH) 2 /TGO is 52.2% even at 10 A g –1, which is higher than that of Ni(OH) 2 /GO (48.8%). For the high conductivity, the specific capacitance is still 996.2 F g –1 at 1.0 A g –1 even with ultrahigh material loading of 12.48 mg cm –2, which can be transferred to 12.06 F cm –2 calculated by areal specific capacitance. Furthermore, low deterioration is observed in Ni(OH) 2 /TGO (8.8% loss) after 1000-cycle charge–discharge test at 1.0 A g –1, which is lower than that of Ni(OH) 2 /GO (19.5% loss). The asymmetric supercapacitor, using the Ni(OH) 2 /TGO and activated carbon as the positive material and negative material, respectively, exhibits high energy density of 22.5 Wh kg –1 at 86.3 W kg –1 and 17.8 Wh kg –1 even at 4.05 kW kg –1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207