Chiral <i>versus</i> racemic building blocks in supramolecular chemistry: malate salts of organic diamines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(S)-Malic acid forms a salt with N,N'-dimethylpiperazine, [MeN(CH(2)CH(2))(2)NMe]H(2)(2+) x 2C(4)H(5)O(5)(-) (1) (triclinic, P1, Z' = 1), in which the cations link pairs of hydrogen-bonded anion chains to form a molecular ladder. With 4,4'-bipyridyl, (S)-malic acid forms a 1:1 adduct which crystallizes from methanol to yield two polymorphs, (2) (triclinic, P1, Z' = 1) and (3) (monoclinic, C2, Z' = 1), while racemic malic acid with 4,4'-bipyridyl also forms a 1:1 adduct, (4) (monoclinic, P2(1)/c, Z' = 1). In each of (2), (3) and (4) the components are linked by O[bond]H...N and N[bond]H...O into chains of alternating bipyridyl and malate units, which are linked into sheets by O[bond]H...O hydrogen bonds. In each of the 1:1 adducts (5) and (6), formed by, respectively, (S)-malic acid and racemic malic acid with 1,2-bis(4'-pyridyl)ethene, the diamine is disordered over two sets of sites, related by a 180 degrees rotation about the N...N vector. In (5), (C(12)H(10)N(2))H(+) x C(4)H(5)O(5)(-) (triclinic, P1, Z' = 1), the components are again linked by a combination of N[bond]H...O and O[bond]H...O hydrogen bonds into sheets, while in (6) (triclinic, P1;, Z' = 0.5) there is only partial transfer of the H atom from O to N and the malate component is disordered across a centre of inversion. With 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, racemic malic acid forms a 1:2 salt, [(C(6)H(12)N(2))H(2)](2+).2C(4)H(5)O(5)(-) (7) (monoclinic, P2(1)/c, Z' = 2), while (S)-malic acid forms a 1:1 adduct, (8) (monoclinic, P2(1), Z' = 3). There are thus six independent molecular components in each. In (7) the ions are linked by an extensive series of N[bond]H...O and O[bond]H...O hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional framework, but in (8) there is extensive disorder involving all six components, and no refinement proved to be feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".