MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329214330 · doi:10.1109/intlec.2014.6972190

Frequency-adaptive current controller for grid-connected renewable energy systems

2014· article· en· W2329214330 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Mascioli, Majid Pahlevani, Praveen Jain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)Phase-locked loopControl theory (sociology)Open-loop controllerAutomatic frequency controlComputer scienceRenewable energyBand-stop filterSynchronization (alternating current)Frequency gridGridElectronic engineeringEngineeringFilter (signal processing)Control engineeringLow-pass filterElectrical engineeringVoltageTopology (electrical circuits)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adaptive proportional-resonant (APR) controller for current controller of grid-connected DC/AC systems for renewable energy applications is presented. The increase in renewable energy on the electricity grid poses stability risks to the network as the frequency and amplitude are not as tightly regulated as in previous years. The proposed APR controller is able to maintain high quality current at frequencies well beyond the IEEE1547 standard. The controller is constructed in two parts, a phase-locked loop (PLL) for synchronization and identification of the grid frequency, and a current controller based on the form of the well-known PR controller. The current controller is able to dynamically adjust to the shifting frequency of grid which ensures high quality, unity power-factor across the 59.3-60.5Hz spectrum set by IEEE1547, and beyond. The PLL implemented is an amplitude-decoupled adaptive notch filter (AANF) which provides a very fast, an accurate solution for frequency estimation as well as reference signal generation. The AANF and the APR controller are implemented digitally on an FPGA platform and verified experimentally on a 1kW DC/AC prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207