Comparative analysis of induction of osmotic-stress-dependent genes in <i>Vibrio vulnificus</i> exposed to hyper- and hypo-osmotic stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vibrio vulnificus, a halophilic pathogenic bacterium of marine environments, encounters changes in salinity in its natural habitat and in the food-processing environment. The comparative response of V. vulnificus to hyperosmotic and hypoosmotic stress in terms of gene expression was investigated. Genes belonging to the proU operon for transport of compatible solutes and compatible solute synthesis were significantly upregulated (3- to 4.7-fold) under hyperosmotic stress. Under hypoosmotic stress, upregulation of genes coding for mechanosensitive channels of small conductance (mscS) was not observed. In hyperosmotic conditions a 2.3-fold decrease in the expression of aqpZ was observed. A 2-fold induction in gyrA was observed in V. vulnificus cells on exposure to hyperosmotic stress. groEL genes, VVA1659 (1.6-fold), and VV3106 (1-fold) were induced in hypoosmotic condition. Results of this study indicate that to manage hyperosmotic stress, V. vulnificus accumulated osmoprotectants through uptake or through endogenous synthesis of compatible solutes. Expression of mscS may not be necessary for immediate protection in cells exposed to hyper- and hypo-osmotic stress. Comparative analysis of important osmotic-stress-related genes showed up- or down-regulation of 14 genes in hyperosmotic stress as compared with up- or down-regulation of only 7 genes in hypoosmotic stress, indicating that the cells respond asymmetrically to hyper- and hypo-osmotic stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".