Assessment of End Zone Cracking in Precast Prestressed NU Girders in Bridges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>NU girders, a type of precast prestressed concrete girder with I-shaped cross-section, have been widely used in Alberta, Canada, since 2001. Cracks in the end zones after fabrication are usually between 0,1 mm to 0,5 mm wide and may pose a risk to serviceability, durability and/or load carrying capacity of the girders. Condition inspection guidelines for bridges led to very low ratings (i.e. girder rated as poor) of new girders due to these end zone cracks.</p><p>The objectives of this study were to assess the amount and pattern of end zone cracking through inspections of selected in-service NU girder bridges, to analytically and numerically assess potential risks of cracks and to develop guidelines for condition inspection for these girders. The inspection program included detailed visual inspections of the end zones of 21 bridges with various NU girder simple span and continuous bridge configurations. Analyses were carried out to evaluate the impact of cracks on the shear capacity in the girder end zones and in the bearing zones with respect to serviceability and structural safety such as end zone bearing and shear. Crack widths were also evaluated with respect to durability.</p><p>The results show that most cracks in the girder end zones likely formed during fabrication and construction. The cracks typically remain hairline (0,1 mm or less) under service conditions and do not pose safety concerns. Narrow cracks (0,2 mm to 0,5 mm) usually do not reduce the load carrying capacity and serviceability of the girders, but could affect long-term durability. Condition inspection guidelines were proposed for adoption to NU girders. These included guidelines to identify cracks that have the potential to affect the load carrying capacity of the girders.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".