MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329407420 · doi:10.6028/jres.110.027

Commissioning of the NPDGamma detector array: Counting statistics in current mode operation and parity violation in the capture of cold neutrons on B4C and Al-27

2005· article· en· W2329407420 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Gericke, J. D. Bowman, R. Carlini, T. E. Chupp, K. P. Coulter, M. Dabaghyan, D. Desai, S. J. Freedman, T. Gentile, R. C. Gillis, Geoffrey L. Greene, F. W. Hersman, Takashi Ino, S. Ishimoto, G. L. Jones, B. Lauss, M. Leuschner, B. Losowski, R. Mahurin, Y. Masuda, Gregory S. Mitchell, S. Muto, H. Nann, S. A. Page, W. D. Ramsay, S. Santra, P.‐N. Seo, É. I. Sharapov, T Smith, W. M. Snow, W. S. Wilburn, V. W. Yuan, H. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSpallation Neutron SourceNeutronDetectorNuclear physicsNeutron detectionOpticsNeutron capturePreamplifierParity (physics)SpallationNeutron sourceAtomic physicsOptoelectronicsAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NPDGamma γ-ray detector has been built to measure, with high accuracy, the size of the small parity-violating asymmetry in the angular distribution of gamma rays from the capture of polarized cold neutrons by protons. The high cold neutron flux at the Los Alamos Neutron Scattering Center (LANSCE) spallation neutron source and control of systematic errors require the use of current mode detection with vacuum photodiodes and low-noise solid-state preamplifiers. We show that the detector array operates at counting statistics and that the asymmetries due to B4C and (27)Al are zero to with- in 2 × 10(-6) and 7 × 10(-7), respectively. Boron and aluminum are used throughout the experiment. The results presented here are preliminary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and TechnologySame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207