MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329450145 · doi:10.1061/41173(414)416

Destruction of DNAPL through a Green Technology—TCE Source Area Bioremediation

2011· article· en· W2329450145 on OpenAlexaff
Irene Schaffner, Eric C. Lindhult, S. R. Lamb, Kent C. Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsBrampton Civic HospitalIron Ore Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemedial actionEnvironmental remediationGroundwaterBioremediationChlorinated solventsEnvironmental scienceOverburdenGroundwater contaminationGroundwater remediationWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryContaminationChemistryAquiferMining engineeringGeologyEngineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single-injection of a proprietary electron donor additive remediated a trichloroethene (TCE) dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source, reducing TCE concentrations by 99.99 percent in less than 9 years. The remedial program achieved the enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD) of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (cVOCs) within an overburden groundwater source area at a site located in central New Hampshire, USA. The baseline TCE concentration was 97,400 micrograms per liter (μg/L) in September 2001 and decreased to less than 10 μg/L by May 2010. This green technology destroyed the DNAPL and has shown great promise at other cVOC-impacted sites for both full-scale and Proof-of-Concept remedial programs. The Proof-of-Concept test, which is discussed at the end of the paper, is an economical means to evaluate feasibility and advance a site toward cost-effective full-scale remediation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011Same topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207