MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2329476154 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov061.51

HG-14 * CLINICAL, RADIOGRAPHIC, AND HISTOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LONG-TERM SURVIVORS OF DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA: A REPORT FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY

2015· article· en· W2329476154 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsey M. Hoffman, Ute Bartels, Lili Miles, Cynthia Hawkins, Stewart Goldman, Sarah Leary, Tim Hassal, Jane E. Minturn, R. Packer, Nicholas K. Foreman, Katherine E. Warren, Alberto Broniscer, Emmett Broxon, Chie‐Schin Shih, Jim Leach, Blaise V. Jones, Joshua Baugh, B. Hacker, Brianna Lerme, Chris Jones, Sara R. Savage, Jenavieve Kirkendall, Renee Doughman, Michael R. Wollman, Louise Millett, Regis J. O’Keefe, Éric Bouffet, Dannis G van Vuurden, Maryam Fouladi

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Radiation therapyRadiographyChemotherapyGliomaBiopsyRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children with diffuse intrinsic brainstem glioma (DIPG) have a median survival of less than 1 year despite radiation ± chemotherapy. The International DIPG Registry, a collaborative effort among researchers in North America and Australia has enrolled 395 patients with data for over 900 patients committed from 35 institutions. Among the 395 patients, 32 long-term survivors (LTS) (overall survival [OS] ≥2 years) have been identified. Preliminarily, we report clinical, radiographic, and histologic data for 75 of 395 patients, including the 32 LTS and 43 in the comparison (C) group. On central radiographic review, 5 were deemed not to represent DIPG (3 LTS and 2 C). Median age at diagnosis for LTS and C groups was 5.5 and 6.1 years, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of LTS had >6 weeks between onset of symptoms and diagnosis versus 28% for the comparison group (p < 0.05). Incidence of signs and symptoms at diagnosis (cranial nerve, cerebellar, or pyramidal) was similar in both groups. All patients, except 3 LTS, underwent radiation at diagnosis; all but 6 received adjunct chemotherapy. Median OS was 28.4 and 10.8 months for the LTS and C groups, respectively. Two patients (1 LTS) had an H3.3K27M mutation and 2 (1 LTS) had an H3.1K27M mutation. Biology data from 25 other patients from autopsy (n = 12) or biopsy (n = 13) are under analysis. Presence of enhancement on diagnostic imaging was associated with poorer survival (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in radiographic evidence of hemorrhage, necrosis, diffusion restriction, or tumor size between LTS and C groups. Preliminary data in children with DIPG suggest that LTS have a longer duration of presenting signs and symptoms and less often display radiographic evidence of enhancement at diagnosis. Complete clinical, radiographic, and biology (where available) data on all 395 patients enrolled are currently being analyzed and will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→