MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abandoned therapies and unpublished trials in rheumatoid arthritis

2003· review· en· W2329486472 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Keystone

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Rheumatology · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisBiologic AgentsClinical trialIntensive care medicineDiseaseArthritisImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capability of selectively targeting pathogenic elements of disease with biologic therapies has created a new therapeutic repertoire. Although a substantial number of biologic agents have been developed for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, few have been approved for use. Most of the agents have failed to reach the approval stage because of inadequate clinical benefit. Despite this, studies of these agents have provided extremely valuable lessons in study design, immunobiology, pharmacodynamic evaluation, and the utility of animal models in the development of biologic agents. These insights have laid the groundwork for future development of other novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in RheumatologySame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207