Commentary on “Motor Development of Infants With Univentricular Heart at the Ages of 16 and 52 Weeks”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
How could I apply this information? Infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and other types of functional univentricular heart (UVH) are at high risk for delayed motor development during the first year of life. Early therapeutic intervention may be necessary to advance motor development, particularly for those infants with HLHS and UVH who have undergone open-heart surgery. Specifically, extensive family education on the benefits of prone play may be critical once the infant is medically cleared to be positioned prone. In addition, direct intervention to promote motor development may be necessary due to the complex medical status of the infant and the family's level of comfort in progressing motor skills of an infant who has recently undergone cardiac surgery. What should I be mindful about when applying this information? It is unclear what factors were associated with the delayed motor development observed in infants with HLHS and UVH. All 23 infants with HLHS and 5 of 13 infants with UVH underwent 2 cardiac surgeries, yet Alberta Infant Motor Scale subtests were only provided for the HLHS and UVH infant groups as a whole. Therefore, it is unclear whether motor development was delayed only for the infants who underwent cardiac surgery or also for some infants who did not undergo surgical intervention. In addition, 6 infants with HLHS and 4 infants with UVH received physical therapy intervention during the course of the study; however, it is unclear whether these infants continued to demonstrate delayed development at the 12-month assessment and why a greater number of infants were not referred for therapeutic intervention. Infants with HLHS and those with UVH demonstrate delayed motor development, particularly in prone and standing skills; however, further research is necessary to clarify the factors associated with motor delay. Barbara Sargent PT, PhD, PCS University of Southern California, Los Angeles Leesha Augustine, PT, DPT Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.048 | 0.049 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".