MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329582165 · doi:10.1542/pir.33-3-110

Intellectual Disability (Mental Retardation)

2012· review· en· W2329582165 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah Shea

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatrics in Review · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual disabilityMedicinePsychologyPsychiatryPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Sarah E. Shea, MD, FRCPC* 1. *Editorial board member; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. * Abbreviations: AAIDD: : American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities ADHD: : attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder CT: : computed tomography DSM: : Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders FAPE: : free appropriate public education FAS: : fetal alcohol syndrome ID: : intellectual disability IQ: : intelligence quotient MR: : mental retardation The approach to genetic testing in the evaluation of intellectual disability is changing with the introduction of newer techniques, such as microarray testing. After reading this article, readers should be able to: 1. Understand the terminology and definitions relevant to individuals who are intellectually disabled. 2. Be aware of the epidemiology, clinical presentations, and causes of intellectual disability (ID). 3. Know how to carry out an evaluation for the cause of a child's ID, realizing that in many cases a cause cannot be identified, and know how to assess the child's strengths and weaknesses. 4. Be aware of the latest trends in genetic testing in identifying the causes of ID. 5. Know the conditions that commonly coexist with ID and know proper medical follow-up. 6. Understand what is involved in the education of children and adolescents with ID, as well as reasonable expectations. 7. Be aware of ways to help an intellectually disabled youth transition to adulthood. Intellectual disability is a general term for what has previously been described as mental retardation. ID is a lifelong condition characterized by significant impairment of cognitive and adaptive development owing to abnormalities of brain structure or function. ID is not a single entity, but rather a general symptom of neurologic dysfunction. At this time, the terminology used with respect to intellectual disability (ID) (mental retardation [MR]) is shifting. The term mental retardation is still in use in many settings, including by some clinicians, and is found in legal and public policies that determine eligibility for support; however, the use of the term intellectual disability as a direct substitute for mental retardation is increasing. The American Association on Mental Retardation has been renamed …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatrics in ReviewSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207