MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329633650 · doi:10.1021/jz402052s

Throwing Salt into the Mix: Altering Interfacial Water Structure by Electrolyte Addition

2013· article· en· W2329633650 on OpenAlexaff
Paul A. Covert, Kailash C. Jena, Dennis K. Hore

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteIonic bondingChemical physicsIonic strengthPolystyrenePolymerIonMaterials scienceAqueous solutionInfrared spectroscopyChemistryChemical engineeringPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interfacial water commonly distinguishes itself from the bulk phase by adopting a polar, ordered structure. It is well-established that electrolytes can act to perturb this structure; however, the nature of this perturbation remains a topic of interest. In this study, surface- and structure-sensitive nonlinear vibrational spectroscopy is used to monitor electrolyte-induced changes in interfacial water structure. Solution ionic strength was varied over 5 orders of magnitude, and spectra were collected from two mineral surfaces (fused silica and calcium fluoride) and two polymer surfaces (polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate)). Analysis of the spectra reveals striking similarities and differences between these four aqueous interfaces; trends in overall intensity do not always follow changes in the spectral shape. Our results reveal the complex interplay between surface charge, ion adsorption, and hydrophobicity in determining interfacial water structure in the presence of dissolved ions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207