MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329678519 · doi:10.7227/ijmee.40.4.4

Linear-Graph Modeling Paradigms for Mechatronic Systems

2012· article· en· W2329678519 on OpenAlexafffund
Clarence W. de Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicModeling and Simulation Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMechatronicsComputer scienceControl engineeringGraphDomain (mathematical analysis)Bond graphSystems modelingGraph theorySystem dynamicsTheoretical computer scienceModeling and simulationSystems engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringSoftware engineeringSimulationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concepts of mechatronics are applicable to complex and multi-domain dynamic systems. Proper modeling of such systems can benefit analysis, simulation, design and control of these systems. The linear-graph (LG) approach is particularly suitable in mechatronic modeling because it presents a unified way to represent different domains and also provides a direct correspondence to the topology of the physical components of a system. This paper presents some useful concepts of graph trees and generalized equivalent circuits as applied to LGs, which can facilitate modeling of mechatronic systems. The significance and application of the presented paradigms of modeling are indicated using examples. These paradigms have been integrated into both an undergraduate course and a postgraduate course on the modeling of dynamic systems. Students have appreciated this integrated and systematic approach to modeling of multi-domain (mechatronic) systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mechanical Engineering EducationSame topicModeling and Simulation SystemsFrench-language works237,207