MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329798779 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-2570

High-Order Compact-Stencil Summation-By-Parts Operators for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations

2013· article· en· W2329798779 on OpenAlexaff
David C. Del Rey Fernández, David W. Zingg

Bibliographic record

Venue21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStencilNavier–Stokes equationsSummation by partsCompressibilityOrder (exchange)Applied mathematicsMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsMechanicsComputational science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A general framework is presented for deriving minimum-stencil high-order summationby-parts finite-difference operators for the second derivative with variable coefficients, for orders of accuracy 3 through 6. These operators can be used to construct time-stable numerical schemes with simultaneous approximation terms to weakly impose boundary conditions. The derivation of these operators leads to various free parameters which can be used for optimization of the operator about criteria such as spectral radius and truncation error. The operators are 2p accurate on the interior, where the interior stencil has 2p+1 nodes, but p accurate at the boundaries. Nonetheless, for purely parabolic problems, they can be shown to be p+2 globally accurate. However, for the Navier-Stokes equations, the continuity equation renders the method p + 1 accurate. We present a novel means of circumventing this degradation in accuracy by using p + 2 globally accurate operators for the continuity equation, and we prove that the new discretization remains amenable to the energy method, a necessary condition to prove time stability. Numerical tests on the one-dimensional linear convection-diffusion equation and the oneand three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations using the method of manufactured solutions are used for verification and characterization studies. We show that for the Navier-Stokes equations using a p+ 2 globally accurate first derivative for the continuity equation substantially increases the accuracy benefits of the minimum-stencil operator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics ConferenceSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207