A Case of Golden Retriever with Well-differentiated Fibrosarcoma on the Front of the Head
Bibliographic record
Abstract
11歳齢、雄のゴールデン・レトリーバーが線維腫と診断された前頭部腫瘤の再発を主訴に来院した。腫瘤は頭蓋骨への固着が著しく、眼窩へも浸潤しており、高分化型線維肉腫と再診断された。X線CT所見に基づき、頬骨突起と前頭骨の一部を含めて腫瘤を切除するとともに、圧迫され変形した眼球を摘出した。切除後の摘出部位の修復は、側頭筋を剥離し反転させた被覆と多孔性ゼラチンスポンジの充填とした。術後、一時的な皮下気腫と皮膚発赤が認められたが経過は良好であり、術後約1年3ヵ月を経過した時点で腫瘍再発ならびに転移の徴候は認められていない。大型犬、とくにゴールデン・レトリーバーの頭部腫瘤については、病理組織学的に良性な線維腫と診断された場合であっても、高分化型繊維肉腫の可能性を考えた対応が必要と思われる。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".