Lc-Dad-Ms-Assisted Quantification Of Marker Compounds In Hypericum Perforatum L. (St. John's Wort) And Its Antioxidant Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s Wort) is a reputed plant with a long service to humankind. In the current study, antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of the aerial parts of H. perforatum growing in Turkey along with hyperoside and hyperforin was evaluated by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, metal-chelation, and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays. The major components including chlorogenic acid, the flavonoid derivatives; rutin, hyperoside, quercitrin, quercetin, and biapigenin, the naphthodianthrons; pseudohypericin and hypericin, and the phloroglucinol derivatives; hyperforin and adhyperforin were quantified in the extract by LC-DAD-MS. Hypericin (16 ± 0.08 μg/g) and hiperforin (1164 ± 0.02 μg/g) contents in H. perforatum were found to be in accordance with the amounts required by the European Pharmacopeia. The extract and hyperoside exerted a remarkable antioxidant activity in DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP assays, whereas they did not have metal-chelation capacity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".