Physical and Ecological Controls on Freshwater Floc Trace Metal Dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significantly higher concentrations of Ag, As, Cu, Co, Ni, and Pb are found in suspended floc compared to surficial bed sediments for a freshwater beach in Lake Ontario. Contrasting observed element-specific bed sediment metal partitioning patterns, floc sequestration for all elements is dominated by one substrate: amorphous oxyhydroxides. More specifically, floc metal scavenging is controlled by floc biogeochemical architecture. Floc organics, largely living microbial cells and associated exopolymeric substances (EPS), act as scaffolds for the collection and/or templating of amorphous Fe oxyhydroxides. While interactions between floc organics and amorphous Fe oxyhydroxides affected floc sorption behavior, specific element affinities and competition for these limited substrates was important for overall floc partitioning. Further, assessment of metal dynamics during stormy conditions indicated energy-regime driven shifts in floc and bed sediment partitioning that were specifically linked to the exchange of floc and bed sedimentary materials. These novel results demonstrate that the microbial nature of floc formation exerts an important control on floc metal dynamics distinguishable from surficial bed sediments and that hydrologic energy-regime is an important factor to consider in overall floc metal behavior, especially in beach environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".