MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330184794 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-5449

Abstract 5449: Histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma - effect of <i>ex vivo</i> treatment on primary patient samples

2010· article· en· W2330184794 on OpenAlexaff
Torsten Holm Nielsen, Luca A. Petruccelli, Monica C. Dobocan, Filippa Petterson, Tina Haliotis, Sarit Assouline, Koren K. Mann, Wilson H. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular lymphomaPanobinostatMantle cell lymphomaMedicineCancer researchLymphomaChronic lymphocytic leukemiaPropidium iodideVorinostatPathologyImmunologyLeukemiaHistone deacetylaseChemistryProgrammed cell deathApoptosisHistone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) is approved in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, but the efficacy in other lymphomas, particularly B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL), remains to be established. To investigate the hypothesis that HDACis have anti-neoplastic effects in B-NHL, we have tested a series of primary B-NHL patient samples for response to the two HDACis Vorinostat (SAHA) and Panobinostat (LBH589). Lymph node biopsies from patients with B-NHL were obtained with patient consent. A single-cell suspension was prepared and mononuclear cells isolated by Ficoll gradient separation. Lymphocytes were treated with clinically achievable doses of SAHA (2.5 μM, 5 μM and 7 μM) and LBH589 (10 nM, 25 nM and 50 nM) ex vivo for 48 hours. Treatment effect was evaluated by assays of cell viability (trypan blue staining and Cell TiterGlo luminescence assay) and cell death (propidium iodide staining analyzed by flow cytometric quantification of the sub-G0 cell population). Expression of acetylated histone H4, Bcl-2 and BCL6 was evaluated by western blot. To date, 16 patient samples, covering a wide variety of B-NHL, have been analyzed. Diagnoses include: follicular lymphoma (n=7), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=5), mantle cell lymphoma (n=1), nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n=1), hairy cell leukemia (n=1) and small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1). Fifteen out of 16 patient samples analyzed showed moderate to high sensitivity to one or both HDACis tested at the given concentrations. Overall, the effects of SAHA and LBH589 were comparable. Western blots of lymphocytes treated with both types of HDACi showed increased acetylation of histone H4 compared to untreated cells. No change in Bcl-2 expression was seen (n=2) and no expression of BCL6 was detected in the samples tested for this (n=2). Based on the data outlined herein, B-NHL is sensitive to the growth inhibitory effects of HDACis at clinically achievable doses. Building upon this pilot study, we are developing cell line models of B-NHL in order to characterize the mechanism of action of HDACis in B-NHL, including combination therapy with currently used agents such as Rituximab. A phase 2 clinical trial of LBH589 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including an arm evaluating combination therapy with Rituximab, is also planned. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5449.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchFrench-language works237,207