MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330192209 · doi:10.1021/jp307322j

Structures and Vibrational Spectra of SO<sub><i>n</i></sub><sup><i>p</i>–</sup> Sulfur Oxides, MSO<sub><i>n</i></sub><sup>–</sup> Anions, and MSO<sub><i>n</i></sub>, M<sub>2</sub>SO<sub><i>n</i></sub> Salts in the Gas phase (<i>n</i> = 1–3; <i>p</i> = 0–2; M = Li, Na, K). A Density Functional Theory Study

2012· article· en· W2330192209 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal and Kinetic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryIonDenticityCrystallographyMoleculeBinding energySinglet stateSpectral lineRadicalMultiplicity (mathematics)Computational chemistryAtomic physicsExcited stateCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This theoretical study focuses on geometries, vibrational spectra, charge distributions, electron affinities, and reaction energies for SO(n)(p-) anions and alkali salts MSO(n)(-), M(1,2)SO(n) in the gas phase (n = 1-3; p = 0-2; M = Li-K). Most of our data for compounds with the S oxidation states 0, 2, and 4 are new in the literature. The bulk of the results are obtained at the B3PW91 level, with CCSD(T)=FC calculations carried out for relative energy calibrations; the 6-311+G(3df) basis set is used throughout. The formation of contact ion pairs is prevalent; they are of type: (i) M(+)(SO(n)(-)) for the π-radicals MSO, MSO(2), MSO(3) of doublet multiplicity; (ii) (M(+))(2)(SO(n)(2-)) for M(2)SO, M(2)SO(2), M(2)SO(3) in their singlet ground states; and (iii) M(ns)(SO(n)(-)) for the radicals MSO(-), MSO(2)(-), MSO(3)(-) in their triplet states. When isolated in matrices, M(2)SO and M(2)SO(2) will facilitate the spectroscopic study of the little known SO(2-) and SO(2)(2-) ions. Divalent M(2)SO(n) salts, due to their large dipole moments, should be highly soluble in polar solvents, first dissociating into MSO(n)(-) + M(+) products. For MSO(3), bidentate coordination OS(O(2)M) is preferred over tridentate S(O(3)M) binding. We confirm that all MSO(2) molecules are planar, at variance with an ESR study assigning to NaSO(2) a nonplanar structure. This study partially support the assignment of an experimental frequency at 918.2 cm(-1) (932 cm(-1), calculated) to the antisymmetric ν(a)(SO) mode of the elusive sulfoxilate ion, SO(2)(2-). A definitive identification, however, would require to record the vibrational spectrum below 800 cm(-1) (apparently not done in the original work) because the missing symmetric ν(s)(SO) mode is here found to lie around 760 cm(-1), exhibiting high intensity in both IR and Raman spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it