Syntheses of New Ionic Technetium(III) Complexes Containing Four Monodentate Phosphine Ligands. Crystal Structures of <i>trans-</i>[Tc(PMe<sub>2</sub>Ph)<sub>4</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]PF<sub>6</sub>, <i>trans-</i>[Tc(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]BPh<sub>4</sub>, and <i>trans-</i>[Tc(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]PF<sub>6</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New ionic technetium complexes of the type trans-[Tc(PR3)4Cl2]+ are synthesized by various methods. The simplest method is the reaction of [TcO4]- with the phosphine in methanol in the presence of a chloride salt. Compounds containing PMe2Ph and PMe3 are synthesized and characterized by crystallographic methods. The complexes containing the less bulky phosphine can be prepared from complexes containing the bulker phosphine. The compounds are paramagnetic, with two unpaired electrons. The complexes studied by X-ray diffraction methods are the trans isomers. [Tc(PMe2Ph)4Cl2]PF6 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/c, with a = 11.511(2) A, b = 26.713(7) A, c = 12.688(3) A, beta = 92.79(1) degrees, Z = 4, and R1 = 0.0574. [Tc(PMe3)4Cl2]BPh4 (II) crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbcn, with a = 18.213(5) A, b = 22.950(5) A, c = 19.428(6) A, Z = 8, and R1 = 0.0691. [Tc(PMe3)4Cl2]PF6 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/c, with a = 18.152(7) A, b = 16.838(9) A, c = 18.090(6) A, beta = 106.63(1) degrees, Z = 8, and R1 = 0.0670. The compounds all have octahedral coordination, but an important tetrahedral deformation of the plane containing the Tc and the four P atoms is observed in each case. In II, the two independent Tc atoms are both located on 2-fold axes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".