MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2330304698 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100016474

Hyperacute Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke: Shed DWI Light

2014· letter· fr· W2330304698 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Mahesh Kate, Ashfaq Shuaib

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2014
Typeletter
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCirculation (fluid dynamics)Stroke (engine)Ischemic strokeMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyNeurosciencePsychologyIschemiaMechanicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

posterior circulation strokes (pCS) and transient ischemic attacks (tia's) account for 15-23% of all ischemic strokes/tia, 1,2 the prognosis is similar to anterior circulation in terms of persistent functional disability at three months.2,3 they have higher rate of recurrent strokes and tia 4 and yet it is Cinderella disease.Baseline national institute of health Stroke Scale (nihSS) is falsely low in patients with pCS and may influence thrombolysis decision.5 the current Canadian Best practice recommendation for Stroke Care 6 strongly recommend immediate brain and vascular imaging for all patients with suspected acute stroke patients with computed tomogram (Ct)/ Ct angiography (Cta) or magnetic resonance imaging (Mri) diffusion weighted imaging (dWi) sequence / magnetic resonance angiography (Mra).american heart association guidelines for acute stroke treatment also recommend noninvasive angiography of intracranial vessels if intra-arterial therapy is contemplated 7 but suggest non-contrast Ct (nCCt) alone is sufficient for thrombolysis decision.Both the recommendations do not distinguish anterior and posterior circulation stroke and practice pattern for imaging in acute stroke is highly variable.apparently normal nCCt and low nihSS (≤4) may exclude thrombolysis eligible pCS patients presenting in the <4.5 hours (and in selected patients up to six hours but this remains to be proven in further randomized studies 8 ).Magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging is better than nCCt to detect early ischemic changes in pCS and Mra would be able to diagnose vertebro-basilar artery occlusion (VBao).Computed tomogram angiography can also reliably detect VBao.But absence of visible occlusion does not always translate to good outcome in patients with early dWi lesion.9 Computed tomogram angiography source images (Si) pc-aSpeCtS ≥8 has been associated with favorable outcome in pCS albeit inconsistently.10 pc-apSpeCt≥7 on dWi has sensitivity of 0.74, specificity of 0.82 and negative predictive value of 0.95 for predicting favorable outcome in pCS 11 .a similar number for acute basilar artery occlusion is pc-aSpeCtS ≥8 on dWi. 12 further Mri perfusion weighted imaging (pWi) can also help in selection of patients for intra-arterial stroke therapies for acute basilar artery occlusion in more reliable manner then Ct perfusion.13 in a retrospective study published in the current issue of the Journal, the role of dWi lesion assessment in hyperacute pCS, as a prognostic marker for early neurological deterioration (end) and unfavorable outcome (ufo) at three months is discussed by lee et al. 14 one-third of patients with pCS presented in first six hours and thus were amenable to thrombolysis.all patients were subjected to diagnostic Mri with mean door-to-Mri time of 74±149 minutes for all patients, 30±11 minutes for moderate to severe pCS. the over-all the Canadian Journal of neurologiCal SCienCeS 139

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0140.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→