Comparison between femtosecond laser mushroom configuration and manual trephine straight-edge configuration deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human multidrug resistance proteins MRP4 and MRP5 are organic anion transporters that have the unusual ability to transport cyclic nucleotides and some nucleoside monophosphate analogs. Base and nucleoside analogs used in the chemotherapy of cancer and viral infections are potential substrates. To assess the possible contribution of MRP4 and MRP5 to resistance against these drugs, we have investigated the transport mediated by MRP4 and MRP5. In cytotoxicity assays, MRP4 conferred resistance to the antiviral agent 9-(2-phosphonomethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA) and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis showed that, like MRP5, MRP4 transported PMEA in an unmodified form. MRP4 also mediated substantial resistance against other acyclic nucleoside phosphonates, whereas MRP5 did not. Apart from low-level MRP4-mediated cladribine resistance, the cytotoxicity of clinically used anticancer nucleosides was not influenced by overexpression of MRP4 or MRP5. In contrast, MRP5 mediated efflux of the pyrimidine-based antiviral 2′,3′-dideoxynucleoside 2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxythymidine 5′-monophosphate (d4TMP) and its phosphoramidate derivative alaninyl-d4TMP from cells loaded with the 2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxythymidine prodrugs cyclosaligenyl-d4TMP and aryloxyphosphoramidate d4TMP (So324), respectively. Moreover, only inside-out membrane vesicles derived from MRP5-overexpressing cells accumulated alaninyl-d4TMP. Cellular efflux and vesicular uptake studies were carried out to further compare transport mediated by MRP4 and MRP5 and showed that dipyridamole, dilazep, nitrobenzyl mercaptopurine riboside, sildenafil, trequinsin and MK571 inhibited MRP4 more than MRP5, whereas cyclic nucleotides and monophosphorylated nucleoside analogs were equally poor inhibitors of both pumps. These results strongly suggest that the affinity of MRP4 and MRP5 for nucleotide-based substrates is low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".