Early Treatment of a Progressive Rasmussen's Like Syndrome with Ganciclovir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Escalating focal sensorimotor seizures, progressive neurologic deficit and cognitive decline with associated typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings or pathological confirmation constitute the syndrome of Rasmussen's encephalitis. METHODS: Three patients with this clinical scenario had long-term follow-up after being given the antiviral drug ganciclovir 10 mg/kg/day IV for ten days within one to three months of disease onset. RESULTS: Seizures occurred at least hourly and were localized to the Rolandic region. The MRIs were normal in one patient and in two showed changes consistent with ongoing seizures. Two patients, one whose short-term outcome was reported previously, had immediate and sustained cessation of seizures and resolution of their neurologic deficit. One patient with seizures from both hemispheres did not respond and went on to hemispherectomy that confirmed chronic encephalitis. Seizures continued in five other patients treated 6 to 72 months after disease onset. CONCLUSION: The sustained seizure control after ganciclovir in two of three patients suggests this drug may be effective when given early in the course of this subacute intractable focal epilepsy syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".