Examination of circulation, flushing time and dispersion in Halifax Harbour of Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the circulation, flushing time and hydrodynamic connectivity in Halifax Harbour based on three-dimensional currents produced by a multi-nested coastal ocean circulation modelling system. The time-mean currents produced by the modelling system feature two-layer estuarine circulation with a seaward flow in the upper layer and a landward flow in the lower layer in the Harbour. The hydrodynamics in the Harbour are also affected significantly by tides and wind forcing. Based on numerical passive tracer experiments, the estimated e-folding flushing time is about 40 and 90 days in the upper and the entire Bedford Basin, respectively. By comparison, the flushing time is about 2–5 days over the Inner and Outer Harbour, and only about 1 day in the Narrows. Analysis of passive particle trajectories carried by the model currents demonstrates that movements of particles in the Harbour are strongly affected by tidal and storm-induced currents. Hydrodynamic connectivity in the study region is also quantified in terms of a connectivity matrix calculated from particle trajectories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".