MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330487462 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v61i3.55894

Classrooms and Clinics: Urban Schools and the Protection and Promotion of Child Health, 1870-1930 (2013) by Richard A. Meckel

2016· article· en· W2330487462 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anah-Jayne Markland

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPromotion (chess)Child healthHealth promotionDevelopmental psychologyGerontologyMathematics educationMedicineFamily medicinePolitical scienceLawPublic healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last decades of the 20th century the potential was rediscovered by American child health advocates and activists for child healthcare providers for public schools in the United States to function as clinics to deliver primary healthcare to students.This initiative is far from the first attempt to provide healthcare to children through their schools, and Richard A. Meckel gives a retrospective assessment of earlier efforts in the United States to use schools as healthcare providers.Meckel argues there is a gap in scholarly work concerning the origin and evolution of school hygiene, the original term used for healthcare, in the United States, and his book endeavours to fill this gap by examining when, how, and why the health of schoolchildren was initially thought of as a sociomedical problem needing to be addressed.The overarching aim of the study is to provide a comprehensive history of the "sociomedical and educational discourse" (p. 2) regarding American schools and healthcare during the late-19th and early-20th centuries.The introduction proposes the book will connect changes in the construction and implementation of various interventions and services and examine the arguments surrounding what services governments and schools must provide when they take on the responsibility for the healthy development of schoolchildren.To focus his discussion, Meckel concentrates his study from 1870 to 1930 on American urban public primary schools, leaving rural schools and older children largely out of the study.Meckel first raises an intriguing question that largely drives his study.In chapter 1, Going to School, Getting Sick, he asks, if parents are legally obligated to send their children to school, does the school then have a "legal and moral duty" (p.13) to guarantee children are not being made sick from simply attending?From 1880 to 1890, there were fears that both the places and practices of schools were dangerous to the health of students.The poor conditions of school buildings, and learning practices believed to be overdeveloping the brain and stunting the body, were argued to be at fault for the deteriorating health of students.Schools were originally housed in remodeled or rented buildings never intended to function as a school.For example, in Knoxville, Tennessee, one school was housed in an abandoned hotel, packing over 500 children into 11, 28 by 63 foot rooms.In response to concerns over the physical spaces of schools affecting the health of schoolchildren, buildings began to be specifically constructed to function as schools with better air quality and new ventilation systems, but not all changes were successful.In one New York City, New York, school none of the costly heating and ventilation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207