MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330636001 · doi:10.1061/40792(173)79

Overview of Vulnerabilities of Coastally-Influenced Conveyance and Treatment Infrastructure in Greater Vancouver to Climate Change: Identification of Adaptive Responses

2005· article· en· W2330636001 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brent Burton, Lianglei Gu, Y. Y. Yin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaCapital Regional DistrictUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombined sewerStormwaterCritical infrastructureClimate changeEnvironmental planningVariety (cybernetics)Green infrastructureAdaptive managementSustainabilityEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceDrainageSurface runoffComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) and its member municipalities own and operate a variety of infrastructure including: combined, sanitary and storm sewers; creek and ditch drainage systems; and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). A significant portion of this infrastructure discharges either directly or indirectly to tidally-influenced receiving waters. Thus, both this infrastructure and its functionality can be impacted by coastal conditions, especially sea levels. The GVRD has developed a variety of long-range plans that provide a foundation to manage core infrastructure so as to satisfy various criteria, including protection of the receiving water ecosystem. The Liquid Waste Management Plan (LWMP) outlines a strategy to protect regional sustainability by managing liquid waste and addressing issues such as combined sewer overflows (CSOs), sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), wastewater treatment upgrading and stormwater management. Climate change, along with sea level rise (SLR), has the potential to impact the functionality of this infrastructure over the time frame of long-range planning (LRP). The specific vulnerabilities of coastally-influenced conveyance and treatment infrastructure to the impacts of climate change and SLR have not been widely evaluated in available research. This paper is intended to provide an overview understanding by reviewing some relevant research, identifying and classifying some of the potential vulnerabilities of this infrastructure to climate change and SLR and then discussing possible adaptive strategies for this infrastructure. The field of research into adaptive strategies for infrastructure is expanding, along with a better understanding of these issues. A basic and preliminary methodology to evaluate regional vulnerabilities as part of LRP has been developed for consideration for ultimate refinement and implementation. The magnitude and timing of SLR and climate change is uncertain, but has a large impact on the vulnerability of infrastructure and the scope of appropriate adaptive strategies. Thus, maintenance of maximum system flexibility as reasonable may be an appropriate response for infrastructure planning to respond to a changing climate. Periodic study of developing climate change trends will assist in improving the understanding of both infrastructure vulnerabilities and appropriate adaptive strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207