MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330666378 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-5387

Abstract 5387: Integrative analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic data reveals a critical role for aminosugar metabolism in prostate cancer.

2013· article· en· W2330666378 on OpenAlexaff
Katrin Panzitt, Ali Shojaie, Nagireddy Putluri, Sumanta Basu, Vasanta Putluri, Susmita Samanta, Michael Ittmann, Ismael A. Vergara, George Michailidis, Ganesh S. Palapattu, Arun Sreekumar

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAXYS Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerAminosugarCancerMetabolomicsProstateBiologyTranscriptomeCancer researchMedicineBioinformaticsBiochemistryInternal medicineGlucosamineGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prostate Cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men in the US. Like other tumors, prostate cancer development and progression is dictated by multiple molecular events that include changes in levels of genes, transcripts, proteins and metabolites. To better understand the biology of prostate cancer development it is essential to integrate these disparate yet related datasets. Our laboratory has identified matched transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic changes in localized prostate cancer relative to adjacent benign tissue as well in metastatic disease compared to organ-confined tumor. To study this using a System's Biology approach we have recently embarked on a pilot study aimed at integrating transcriptomic and metabolomic data to obtain biochemical pathways that key to prostate cancer development. Using an in-house network-based enrichment strategy, amino sugar metabolism was found to be significantly enriched in organ-confined prostate cancer but not in metastatic disease. Amino sugar metabolism describes the utilization of glucose-derived carbon and amino acid (mostly glutamine)-derive nitrogen to produce glucosamines. These amino sugars participate in synthesis of immune modulatory compounds as well as in glycosylation cascades. In this study, we describe the molecular analyses of Glucosamine-6 phosphate-N-acetyl Transferase (GNPNAT1), a key enzyme that converts D-glucosamine 6-phosphate to N-acetyl-D-glucosamine 6-phosphate, in prostate cancer. Our results indicate upregulation of GNPNAT1 in organ-confined prostate cancer as compared to benign adjacent tissue as well as metastatic tissue and regulation of the pathway by androgen. Stable knockdown of GNPNAT1 in androgen dependent LNCap cells leads to diminished cell growth and cell cycle arrest. In contrast, growth and cell cycle are not affected by the knockdown of GNPNAT1 in androgen independent C4-2 cells. Knockdown of GNPNAT1 in C4-2 cells enhances invasiveness which is not observed in LNCap knockdown cells. In this work we show that GNPNAT1 is linked to androgen receptor (AR) action and thus is a critical enzyme for the survival of androgen dependent prostate cancer cells. Citation Format: Katrin Panzitt, Ali Shojaie, Nagireddy Putluri, Sumanta Basu, Vasanta Putluri, Susmita Samanta, Michael Ittmann, Ismael Vergara, George Michailidis, Ganesh Palapattu, Arun Sreekumar. Integrative analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic data reveals a critical role for aminosugar metabolism in prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5387. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-5387

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207