MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330670639 · doi:10.1017/s002531541300060x

Effect of unidirectional water currents on displacement behaviour of the green sea urchin <i>Strongylocentrous droebachiensis</i>

2013· article· en· W2330670639 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan L. Morse, Heather L. Hunt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrongylocentrotus droebachiensisSea urchinFlumeBenthic zoneCurrent (fluid)OceanographyEnvironmental scienceWater flowFisheryFlow (mathematics)GeologyBiologyEcologyPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea urchins can have important ecological effects on benthic communities through their aggregation and feeding behaviour. Urchin movement has been demonstrated to be negatively affected by wave action, but the impact of unidirectional tidal currents on urchin movement has not been investigated. This study examines the effect of unidirectional water velocity on the direction of displacement and movement rate of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis . In laboratory flume experiments there was a clear effect of water currents on the displacement of sea urchins. At speeds ≤30 cm s −1 urchins moved across the current in a downstream direction, but at speeds of ≥36 cm s −1 the urchins switched directions by more than 90° and moved across the current in an upstream direction. There was a significant effect of flow speed on urchin movement speed, with urchin movement speed decreasing as water current speed increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United KingdomSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207