MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2330711692 · doi:10.1021/es301426s

Rapidly Equilibrating Micrometer Film Sampler for Priority Pollutants in Air

2012· article· en· W2330711692 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Genualdi, Tom Harner

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolybrominated diphenyl ethersPollutantEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modified polymer-coated glass samplers (POGs), termed EVA samplers, consist of micrometer-thin layers of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) coated onto a glass fiber filter or aluminum foil substrate. These samplers were designed to equilibrate rapidly with priority pollutants in air, making them ideal for short-term spatial studies in ambient or indoor air. The EVA sampler was calibrated by measuring the uptake of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) over 8 weeks in an indoor environment, and four different film thicknesses were monitored that ranged from 0.1 to 30 μm. The results were used to calculate the average mass transfer coefficient (50.5 m/day) and generate contour maps that provide guidance in choosing an appropriate EVA sampler for a particular study based on film thickness, deployment time, and the log K(OA) of the anlayte. A range of air pollutant classes was also added to the EVA sampler prior to deployment to assess depuration rates. These included polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), current-use pesticides (CUPs), perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). On the basis of the depuration profiles, the EVA sampler was a suitable equilibrium sampler for several CUPs and PCBs; however, for the high molecular weight PCBs and PBDEs, the EVA sampler operates as a linear uptake sampler. Samplers were also evaluated for their use as a rapid screening tool for assessing concentrations of siloxanes in indoor air. The EVA sampler was used to estimate air concentrations for D4 and D5 in laboratory air to be 118 and 89 ng/m(3), respectively. Analyses were performed directly using thermal desorption gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TDS-GC-MS). EVA samplers show promise due to their relatively low cost and ease of deployment and applicability to a wide range of priority chemicals. The ability to alter the film thickness, and hence the sorption capacity and performance of the EVA sampler, allows for a versatile sampler that can be used under varying sampling conditions and deployment times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & Technology→Same topicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact→French-language works237,207→