Complexation between α-Cyclodextrin and PEGylated-PAMAM Dendrimers at Low and High pH Values
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted-poly(amido amine) (PEGylated-PAMAM) dendrimers have attracted increasing amounts of attention because of their improved stability, toxicity, and better particle drug leakage property. The complexation of α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) with grafted PEG segments on the surface of PAMAM dendrimers was elucidated by light scattering and titration calorimetry. At pH 10, complexation between α-CD and PEGylated-PAMAM occurred once α-CD was titrated into the PAMAM solution. We observed for the first time a unique phenomenon at pH 2, where no binding took place until a critical α-CD concentration (C*) of ∼8.0 mM was reached. The size of the nanostructures increased from 6.7 to 57.6 nm when the α-CD concentration was increased from 0.5 to 15 mM at pH 2. The zeta potential of PEGylated-PAMAM at pH 2 was +6.7 mV. Thus, the dendrimers possessed positive charges attributed to the protonation of primary amine groups on PAMAM chains that impart electrostatic repulsive forces to the system. The morphology of the complex is expected to be different at two different pH values (2 and 10) because the former produces a clear solution and the latter forms a turbid solution with white precipitates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".