Korrelation von Timed-up & go Test zu WOMAC Fragebogen bei Patienten nach Knie-Totalendoprothesen am Beginn und am Ende einer 3-wöchigen stationären Rehabilitation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Für die Verlaufsdokumentation einer stationären Rehabilitation ist die Bestimmung der Ergebnisqualität von großer Bedeutung. International wird dabei für Patienten nach Knieoperationen ein vom Patienten auszufüllender Fragebogen gemeinsam mit einem klinischen Test verwendet. In unserer Klinik verwenden wir u.a. den Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) als Fragebogen und als klinischen Funktionstest unter anderem den Timed-up-and-go Test (TUAG). Neben der Frage, ob diese beiden Parameter sich zur Verlaufsdokumentation eignen, untersuchten wir auch den Zusammenhang zwischen diesen beiden Tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it