Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Symptomatic Pulmonary Stenosis in Takayasu Arteritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for symptomatic pulmonary stenosis in Takayasu arteritis (TA). METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2012, clinical data of 14 patients [mean age 33.9 ± 9.3 yrs; 11 patients female (78.6%)] with symptomatic pulmonary stenosis in TA underwent PTA and were analyzed prospectively. RESULTS: PTA was successfully performed in 22 lesions of 14 patients. Among those lesions, 18 were treated by PTA alone while the others were treated with stent implantation. Three patients (21.4%) had reperfusion pulmonary injury; 2 patients recovered completely while the other died of respiratory failure 3 days after the procedure. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) decreased from 53.4 ± 15.8 mmHg to 38.4 ± 12.7 mmHg immediately after intervention (p < 0.001). After an average of 29 months of followup, the New York Heart Association functional class and 6-min walking distances improved while mean PAP measured by echocardiography decreased significantly (compared with baseline, all p < 0.01). One patient died of severe pulmonary infection and cardiac shock at 28 months after the procedure. CONCLUSION: The study showed that PTA improved subjective symptoms and objective variables of the patients with symptomatic pulmonary stenosis in TA, with an acceptable mortality. PTA may be a promising therapeutic strategy for symptomatic pulmonary stenosis in TA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".