MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330938530 · doi:10.1061/40792(173)194

Integrating On-Site Water Management Practices: A Field Study in Prince George's County, Maryland

2005· article· en· W2330938530 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tham Saravanapavan, Leslie Shoemaker, Jenny Zhen, Allen P. Davis, Mike Clar, Sharon Meigs, Mow-Song Cheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStormwaterSurface runoffRainwater harvestingEnvironmental scienceLow-impact developmentWater resource managementEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningStormwater management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decentralized and integrated stormwater management is becoming an efficient alternative to more conventional "centralized" structural Best Management Practices (BMPs). Decentralized management techniques, targeted to provide infiltration and minimize runoff closer to the sources, not only meet the stormwater control targets but also maintain the natural ecosystem integrity. On the other hand, conservation and reuse of rainwater and grey water are also emerging as environmentally sensitive "green" architectural techniques. Although both stormwater management and green architecture techniques have similarities, the disciplines have had limited interaction in practice. This study takes a holistic approach to site-level water management by examining both in-home and on-site water management concurrently. An integrated assessment of site-scale water balance provides a quantitative assessment of the benefits of a comprehensive approach that results in virtually no off-site runoff. The analysis was performed on a demonstration site location in Bowie, Maryland, that is representative of single family home. A comprehensive site characterization and evaluation of water uses were performed. The site characterization includes a review of site information (e.g., soils, land use, topography, percolation test, and septic system history) and a field exploration including soil borings, infiltrometers, and chemical sampling of rooftop runoff. Water use profiles for the site potable water, grey water, wastewater, rooftop runoff, and stormwater were evaluated to understand the opportunities and alternatives for integrated stormwater management. A number of alternative scenarios were screened through technical, economical, and social feasibilities and potential alternatives were recommended. The study also evaluated and recommended innovative alternatives for designing the site landscaping for cleansing runoff and conserving water through stormwater recycling, and on-site wastewater treatment (septic) system that integrates opportunities to efficiently utilize water at a site scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207