Electrodeposition of an Iron-Cobalt Phase Isostructural to α-Mn
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrodeposition at elevated temperatures from a dibasic ammonium citrate-stabilized iron-cobalt electroplating solution is shown to promote the deposition of a metastable phase. The metastable phase is isostructural to α-Mn. XRD analysis indicated that the α-Mn-type phase begins to be deposited at temperatures between 30{degree sign}C and 40{degree sign}C. Below this the equilibrium BCC phase is deposited. Plating at 60{degree sign}C produced deposits composed completely of the α-Mn-type phase. TEM analysis indicated that increasing the plating temperature refined the deposit's grain structure and also led to regions with preferred orientation. Annealing of deposits composed of the α-Mn-type phase above its transformation temperature resulted in the formation of a textured BCC phase. The presence of the α-Mn-type phase led to high deposit coercivities. Annealing of deposits, which resulted in transformation of the α-Mn-type phase to the BCC phase, reduced their coercivities. The coercivities of these films, however, were not reduced to the level of those deposits which were plated as the BCC phase. In deposits completely composed of the BCC phase, either plated as such or transformed, annealing led to higher coercivities. This is attributed to coarsening of the deposit microstructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".