MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence and Management of Infusion Reactions to Infliximab in a Prospective Real-Life Community Registry

2012· article· en· W2330969887 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bernie D. Sattin, D. Choquette, F. Nantel

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabIncidence (geometry)AcetaminophenAdverse effectNauseaProspective cohort studyInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseIntravenous InfusionsObservational studyAnesthesiaGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infliximab (IFX) is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting TNFα indicated in the treatment of a number of chronic inflammatory diseases. IFX is administered by intravenous infusion and may be associated with infusion reactions (IR). RemiTRAC Infusion is a prospective Canadian observational registry in which IFX infusions are followed to document the incidence and management of IR, pre-medication use and adverse events (AE). An IR was defined as any AE occurring during the infusion or within 1 hour post infusion. Since its inception in 2005, 1398 patients have been enrolled and 18,121 infusions were recorded. There were 253 Crohn's disease patients (16%) and 80 UC patients (6%). The majority of remaining patients (64%) were treated for rheumatologic conditions. A total of 181/1398 patients reported at least one IR (13%). Only 292/18,121 infusions resulted in an IR (1.6%) and most IRs were mild to moderate in severity (94%). The most common infusion AE was pruritus which occurred in 14.2% of IR. Flushing (9.9%), urticaria (9.2%), nausea (6.3%) dyspnoea (6.0%) and chest discomfort (5.0%) were the only other infusion AEs occurring in ≥5% of IR. Pre-medication, which included anti-histamines, intravenous steroids and/or acetaminophen, was used in 42% of infusions and 1.8% of them were associated with an IR. Interestingly, infusions without any pre-medication were associated with a 1.4% incidence of IR. Infusions pre-medicated with anti-histamines, either alone or in combination with steroids, were associated with a significantly higher incidence of IR, up to 3.3% in the presence of anti-histamines (P < 0.0001) and up to 5.3% in the presence of anti-histamines and steroids (P < 0.0001). In contrast, only acetaminophen pre-medication was associated with a reduced incidence of IR (0.8%, P < 0.0001). We noted that infusions immediately following an IR were associated with a 31% incidence of a subsequent IR (44/140) despite the prevalent use of prophylactic pre-medication. This likely explains the higher incidence of IR in the presence of anti-histamines and/or steroids. This registry shows that, in community-based infusion clinics, infusion reactions to IFX are rare in incidence and largely mild to moderate in nature. Only the use of acetaminophen pre-medication was associated with a lower incidence of IR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207