Extra-ampullary Duodenal Adenocarcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas are rare, and when studied, frequently have been grouped with jejunoileal adenocarcinomas. Nevertheless, anecdotal experiences suggest that these neoplasms may present 2 or more distinct phenotypes. To better characterize these neoplasms, we performed a retrospective review of 38 cases with a special focus on the morphologic and immunophenotypic characteristics and their clinicopathologic significance. Our cohort of extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas was classified on the basis of the morphologic features into gastric type (n=19, 50%), intestinal type (n=14, 37%), pancreaticobiliary type (n=2, 5%), and others (n=3, 8%). Most gastric-type adenocarcinomas (n=18, 95%) developed in the proximal duodenum, whereas the other types were located equally in the proximal and distal duodenum. Intestinal-type dysplasia was present at the periphery of 8 (57%) intestinal-type adenocarcinomas, and 8 (42%) gastric-type adenocarcinoma were associated with gastric-type dysplasia. Gastric foveolar metaplasia (n=12) and Brunner gland hyperplasia (n=10) were exclusively recognized adjacent to gastric-type adenocarcinomas. Notably, intestinal-type histology and the absence of lymph node metastasis were significantly associated with favorable disease-free survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. In summary, this study demonstrated that 2 major subsets of extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma, intestinal type and gastric type, are associated with distinct histopathologic features and clinical behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".