Heterobimetallic Coordination Polymers Based on the [Pt(SCN)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2–</sup> and [Pt(SeCN)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2–</sup> Building Blocks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New complexes and the first coordination polymers containing [Pt(SCN)4](2-) of the type [M(L)x][Pt(SCN)4] (where L = 2,2'-bipyridine (bipy), x = 2, M = Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II); L = ethylenediamine (en), x = 2, M = Ni(II), Cu(II); L = N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda), x = 1, M = Cu(II); L = 2,2';6',2″-terpyridine (terpy), x = 1, M = Mn(II), Co(II); L = 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), x = 2, M = Pb(II)) were prepared by reacting the appropriate metal-ligand cations with K2[Pt(SCN)4] and structurally characterized. [M(bipy)2Pt(SCN)4]2·2MeOH (M = Co (1), Cu (4)) consist of supramolecular tetranuclear distorted squares containing two [M(bipy)2](2+) and two [Pt(SCN)4](2+) units. [Cu(bipy)2(NCS)]2[Pt(SCN)4] (6) is a double salt of the [Pt(SCN)4](2-) anion and two [Cu(bipy)(NCS)](+) cations. [Cu(en)2Pt(SCN)4] (7, 8) are 1-D coordination polymers that are coordinated in either cis or trans fashion at the [Pt(SCN)4](2-) unit, for 7 and 8, respectively. Complexes [Cu(en)2Pt(SeCN)4] (9) and [Ni(en)2Pt(SCN)4] (10) are similar to 8 and 7, respectively, but complex 9 (prepared using ((n)Bu4N)2[Pt(SeCN)4]) also presents intermolecular Se-Se interactions which resulted in an increased dimensionality. Compounds [M(terpy)Pt(SCN)4] (M = Mn (11), Co (13)) involve 2-D sheets of [M(terpy)](2+) and [Pt(SCN)4](2-) units, whereas [Mn(terpy)2][Pt(SCN)4] (12) is a double salt of one [Mn(terpy)2](2+) unit and one [Pt(SCN)4](2-). [Cu(tmeda)Pt(SCN)4] (14) contains a five-coordinate Cu(2+) metal center coordinated to one tmeda ligand and three different [Pt(SCN)4](2-) units, resulting in 2-D sheets. [Pb(phen)2Pt(SCN)4] (15) contains an 8-coordinate Pb(2+) metal center coordinated to two phen ligands and four [Pt(SCN)4](2-), generating a 3-D network in the solid state. Structural correlations were established between the ancillary ligand, the choice of metal, the structure of the [Pt(SCN)4](2-) building block, and the resulting dimensionality of the coordination polymers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".