MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331111548 · doi:10.2514/6.2007-3103

Ka-Band Self-Calibration Direct Modulator for Space Applications

2007· article· en· W2331111548 on OpenAlexaffabout
Weiguo Chen, Arvind Swarup, Lionel Grada, Robert Deschampault

Bibliographic record

Venue25th AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference (organized by APSCC) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCOM DEV International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationSpace (punctuation)Computer sciencePhysicsElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a development work of a high-speed Ka-band digital direct modulator performed in COM DEV for on-board application based on a novel self- calibration technique developed by CRC Canada. Direct modulations can significantly simplify up-conversion hardware and improve efficiency by eliminating intermediate up- conversion stages and corresponding LO sources. These advantages are especially valuable for satellite communications payloads due to strict constraints on payload volume, mass, and power consumption of spacecrafts. To mitigate impairments from quadrature modulator hardware commonly experienced in direct modulation, CRC Canada has developed a novel self-calibration direct modulator technique based on RF envelope sampling and digital signal processing to drive a pre-compensation mechanism. The new technique has been successfully prototyped and tested for ground terminal applications. This paper further addresses development of a Ka-band direct modulator for high-speed on-board transmitters. Test results indicate the new technology can effectively remove degradations from carrier leakage and I-Q imbalance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue25th AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference (organized by APSCC)Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207