MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331134921 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-962

Abstract 962: Prolonged antiangiogenic therapy with oral metronomic topotecan and pazopanib in pediatric solid tumor mouse model.

2013· article· en· W2331134921 on OpenAlexaff
Sushil Kumar, Reza Bayat Mokhtari, Syed S. Islam, Herman Yeger, Sylvain Baruchel

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPazopanibTopotecanMedicineCombination therapyPharmacologyAngiogenesisInternal medicineCD31CancerOncologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: We have previously observed that the combination of daily oral Low Dose Metronomic (LDM) Topotecan (TP) and Pazopanib (PZ) significantly delayed the tumor growth and enhanced the survival in neuroblastoma (NB) mouse models (Kumar et al, 2011). However, this combination (TP+PZ) did not stop tumor growth and the animals eventually died due to disease during the course of therapy. Therefore, we planned to investigate the factors contributing to resistance to this antiangiogenic therapy in NB mouse model. Objectives: To investigate the effect of prolonged TP+PZ therapy on angiogenesis by testing the effect of therapy at different durations in NB mice xenograft model. Methods: Mice bearing subcutaneous SK-N-BE(2) NB xenografts were treated with either of the four regimens, daily, orally: vehicle (untreated), PZ (150 mg pazopanib), TP (1.0 mg/Kg topotecan), TP+PZ (combination of topotecan and pazopanib, same doses as single agents). Durations of treatment planned for each regimen were 28 days, 56 days and 80 days. Animals were sacrificed after these durations or upon end point, whichever was earlier. The criteria for end point are tumor sizes exceeding 2.0 cms in diameter or animals showing signs of morbidity. Results: The animals in control, PZ, TP reached the end point after 23d, 28d and 46d respectively. TP+PZ halted the tumor growth for up to 40 days, after which gradual growth was observed. The mean tumor diameters in the third TP+PZ group reached 1.8 cms at the day 80. CD31 immunofluorescence revealed that all the three durations of TP+PZ significantly lowered microvessel densities compared to the control (P= 0.02, 0.04 and 0.009 respectively for 28, 56 and 80 days respectively). However the ratio of CD31 to α- smooth muscle actin (pericyte marker) stained areas were significantly higher in animals treated with TP+PZ for 56 and 80days, compared to control (P=0.0006; 56d and 0.004; 80d) indicating higher pericyte coverage. TP+PZ (28d) showed signs of necrosis and cell cycle arrest (Ki67 staining), which were not observed in later durations (56 and 80 days) with TP+PZ. Long-term TP+PZ therapy also increased the levels of HIF-1 alpha, VEGF and Oct-4 within the tumor tissue. Conclusion: This study indicates that even though prolonged TP+PZ therapy demonstrates sustained antiangiogenic activity, it encounters resistance in NB, potentially mediated by pericyte coverage. Long-term TP+PZ therapy may also increase tumor stemness. Citation Format: Sushil Kumar, Reza Bayat Mokhtari, Syed Islam, Herman Yeger, Sylvain Baruchel. Prolonged antiangiogenic therapy with oral metronomic topotecan and pazopanib in pediatric solid tumor mouse model. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 962. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-962

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207