MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331283579 · doi:10.1093/rpd/ncu026

On the research needed to better characterise natural radioactivity accumulated in the Arctic by long-range atmospheric transport

2014· editorial· en· W2331283579 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Protection Dosimetry · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)ArcticEnvironmental scienceThe arcticPollutantBiotaPollutionEnvironmental protectionAir pollutionEcologyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades, the Arctic has emerged as a bellwether for the necessity of global environmental protection. Even though far away from major industrial centres that generate pollution, the Arctic receives various pollutants through long-range transport in the atmosphere and oceans. Because there are very limited sources of such pollution in the Arctic, their presence is associated almost entirely with global sources outside the Arctic. The pollutants of industrial or man-made origins from outside of the Arctic are commonly identified as contaminants to the Arctic. Studies on environmental trends of mercury in the air and biota are one of the main subjects of research in the Arctic. Mercury is a global threat to human and environmental health. Most of the mercury studies focus on anthropogenic emissions of mercury and their transport and transformation in the environment. Anthropogenic emissions have been larger than natural emissions since the start of the industrial age about 200 y ago. Artisanal and small-scale gold mining and coal burning for power generation and industrial use are the major sources of anthropogenic mercury emissions to the air. It is estimated that current anthropogenic sources are responsible for ∼30 % of annual emissions of mercury to the air. Another 10 % comes from natural geological sources, and the rest (60 %) is from 'reemissions' of previously released mercury that has built up over long periods of time in surface soils and oceans(1). The Arctic is a remote region, far from major human sources of mercury releases. Despite this, a substantial amount of the mercury is carried into the Arctic region via long-range transport by air and water currents from human sources at lower latitudes. Owing to their traditional local diet particularly from the animals at the top of the Arctic's aquatic food chain where inorganic mercury is transformed into the more toxic form of methylmercury, some Arctic peoples receive high dietary exposure to mercury, and this is raising concerns for human health(2). This situation has called for global actions for air pollution controls, more stringent regulations and improvement of technology in major industrial countries, as evidenced by the Minamata Convention on Mercury formally adopted as international law in October 2013. The new treaty aims to further cut mercury emissions and releases and is the first global convention on environment and health. Long-term monitoring of mercury levels in the air at Canadian monitoring sites(3) has demonstrated a clear declining trend in the past 15 y, even given the ever increasing use of coal for power generation and industry, especially in Asia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation Protection DosimetrySame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207