Synchrotron Infrared Radiation for Electrochemical External Reflection Spectroscopy: A Case Study Using Ferrocyanide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synchrotron infrared radiation has been successfully coupled through an infrared (IR) microscope to a thin-cavity external reflectance cell to study the diffusion controlled redox of a ferrocyanide solution. Excellent signal-to-noise ratios were achieved even at aperture settings close to the diffraction limit. Comparisons of noise levels as a function of aperture size demonstrate that this can be attributed to the high brilliance of synchrotron radiation relative to a conventional thermal source. Time resolved spectroscopic studies of diffusion controlled redox behavior have been measured and compared to purely electrochemical responses of the thin-cavity cell. Marked differences between the two measurements have been explained by analyzing diffusion in both the axial (linear) and radial dimensions. Whereas both terms contribute to the measured current and charge, only species that originate in the volume element above the electrode and diffuse in the direction perpendicular to the electrode surface are interrogated by IR radiation. Implications for the use of ultramicroelectrodes and synchrotron IR (SIR) to study electrochemical processes in the submillisecond time domain are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".