MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331313127 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000945

The Clinical Importance of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

2015· article· en· W2331313127 on OpenAlexaff
Choon Sung Lee, Jung-Ki Ha, Dae-Geun Kim, Chang Ju Hwang, Dong‐Ho Lee, Jae Hwan Cho

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLumbosacral jointMagnetic resonance imagingScoliosisRetrospective cohort studyLumbarRadiographyConfoundingLogistic regressionRadiologyVertebraDegeneration (medical)SurgeryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Study Design. Retrospective review of radiographs. Objective. The objective of this study was to (1) determine the prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) with computed tomography (CT) and (2) correlate LSTV presence with lumbar disc degeneration at each level by magnetic resonance imaging. Summary of Background Data. LSTV is a frequently observed abnormality. Although its prevalence in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been shown, no studies have yet examined the clinical importance of LSTV in patients with AIS. Methods. This study included 385 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for AIS at a single center. Plain radiographs and CT scans were used to detect LSTV. Disc degeneration was analyzed at the L3–4, L4–5, and L5–S1 disc levels with magnetic resonance imaging. The difference in disc degeneration at each level by the presence of LSTV was also analyzed. The effect of lumbar curve type on the disc degeneration of each level was then determined. To minimize confounding factors, logistic regression analysis was performed. Results. The overall prevalence of LSTV in patients with AIS confirmed by CT scans was 12.2% (47/385). The proportion of grade II or more disc degeneration at the L4–5 level was higher in the LSTV(+) group than in the LSTV(−) group (29.8% vs.19.2%) although it was not statistically significant (P = 0.093). Large lumbar curves showed a positive correlation with disc degeneration at the L5–S1 level (P = 0.022). Conclusion. The prevalence of LSTV in patients with AIS was 12.2%. A trend of early degeneration in L4–5 level discs was found in patients with AIS with LSTV although it was not statistically confirmed. Disc degeneration at the L5–S1 level is related to a large lumbar curve. If patients with AIS with large lumbar curves have LSTV, consideration should be given to stopping the distal fusion at L3 instead of L4. Level of Evidence: 4 The prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was 12.2%. A trend of early degeneration in L4–5 level discs was found in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Disc degeneration at the L5–S1 level is related to a large lumbar curve. This result could be helpful in selecting distal fusion level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207